Read more

Read more

Read more

Read more

• Story Highlights
• Brazil beat Belgium 1-0 in opening match of Olympic men’s football
• Hernanes scores the only goal of the game in the 79th minute in Shenyang
• Belgium end with nine men after Vincent Kompany and Marouane Fellaini sent off
• Italy 3-0 Honduras; United States 1-0 Japan; Australia 1-1 Serbia
• Next Article in World Sport »

Read more

Read more

The most famous Packer since the Vince Lombardi era left Green Bay yesterday. He was headed for his home in Mississippi, but sometime before midnight, the Packers worked out a trade that sent him to the Jets, Fox Sports reported.

In exchange for the three-time NFL MVP, the Jets are sending Green Bay a draft pick that would increase in value depending on New York’s finish in 2008, Fox Sports reported.

The Jets would not comment. They are expected to release quarterback Chad Pennington because the team will need to create salary-cap room to accommodate Favre’s contract.

The Jets finished 4-12 last season.

According to Fox Sports, Favre talked to Jets head coach Eric Mangini on Tuesday night as New York team officials tried to convince Favre he would be a good fit in New York.

The trade caps a roller-coaster off-season for Favre, the 38-year-old owner of nearly every meaningful passing record in NFL history.

Favre’s agent, James “Bus” Cook, had confirmed in an e-mail to the Associated Press that the Jets and Tampa Bay Buccaneers were emerging as the most likely trade destinations.

Favre was on a private plane that left for Hattiesburg, Miss., yesterday at 1:25 p.m. Cook and Favre’s wife, Deanna, also were aboard the plane that landed two hours later. Favre’s family home is near Hattiesburg.

Tampa Bay coach Jon Gruden refused to address speculation that the team was on the verge of a deal for Favre.

The Jets’ other quarterbacks are Kellen Clemens, Brett Ratliff and rookie Erik Ainge.

Packers coach Mike McCarthy spoke to Favre again Tuesday night, but there was no indication that their conversation did anything to change the fractured relationship between Favre and the franchise.

“It was just very general,” McCarthy said of the conversation with Favre, who was excused from practice. “Just how he was doing, where he was with the process, things like that.”

McCarthy said he was happy the rest of his players were getting a chance to move forward.

“We talked about it last night,” McCarthy said. “The players want resolution, they want what everybody wants. To come out here every day and talk about somebody that is not here and then shows up, it’s gone on too long, and understandably so. They want to play football.”

Packers players vented frustration over the Favre situation Tuesday after fans chanting “Bring Back Brett!” turned practice into a zoo-like atmosphere and reporters continued asking questions about Favre instead of football.

After McCarthy made it clear Tuesday that Favre’s football future would not be in Green Bay, players seemed to have some sense of closure.

Packers cornerback Charles Woodson - who said Tuesday that the saga had “gone on long enough” - said the Packers’ front office gave players the answers they needed.

“From what I understand, for the most part it’s taken care of,” Woodson said. “Now it’s just about the Packers and not about the situation. It’s over now. From what I understand, it’s pretty much over.”

The final split between the Packers and Favre became obvious Tuesday night. McCarthy told reporters that after extensive conversations with Favre over two days, he had determined that Favre doesn’t have the right mind-set to play for the Packers.

After approximately six hours of what McCarthy called “brutally honest” conversations with Favre, McCarthy said Favre couldn’t seem to get past emotional wounds that were opened as tensions mounted in recent weeks - even with the chance to win his starting job back potentially on the table.

“The train has left the station, whatever analogy you want,” McCarthy said Tuesday.

Favre left Lambeau Field just before Packers practice Tuesday afternoon. “We’re at a stalemate,” he told ESPN Tuesday morning.

Read more

At the last possible moment, the ball hooked just to the left of the base of the foul pole. It caromed sharply to the right after hitting a railing and dropped behind the fence. It appeared clearly to be a foul ball and, as the tabloid television shows like to say, it was all Caught On Tape!

The problem was that third-base umpire Dale Scott didn’t have the zoom lens at his disposal. Or the slo-mo. Or the high-def.

Pretty soon, he will. And that’s a good thing.

Scott called the ball fair and Victorino had a two-run homer in the bottom of the seventh inning last night at Citizens Bank Park and the Marlins’ lead was sliced in half. That’s not a reflection on the well-respected Scott. It is, instead, the human element that those who oppose the use of instant replay like to talk about.

Asked if that was the kind of call in which replay would have been helpful, Scott didn’t hesitate.

“Yes,” he said bluntly. “That is what replay is going to be there for. And replay is coming very soon. I can’t give you a date, but it’s going to be this year.”

The umpires, who may have had some initial misgivings, seem to be all right with that, too.

“Here’s the thing about replay,” Scott continued. “There are a lot of factors in replay that I could go on and on about. There are a lot of ballparks that are not umpire-friendly when it comes to border calls. That’s how they build them. They’re fan-friendly and they don’t want to change that.

“Do we like that? No. But you know what? We’re losing that war, so we’ll accept it and we’ll move on and deal with however Major League Baseball wants us to deal with it. And that’s about all I can say about it. But [Victorino’s line drive] is a perfect example of why they want replay.”

To be fair, some Phillies, including manager Charlie Manuel, still continued to insist that the ball nicked the pole, which would have made it a fair ball.

Scott, however, came away with the opposite conclusion after having had an opportunity to look at the play again.

“It was tough,” he said. “I look at it now and it looks like it just went foul, just missed the pole. Foul ball. After talking to the guys, nobody was 100 percent sure one way or the other. We’re not going to flip a call unless

we’ve got it 100 percent.”

Later, Scott said, he talked to Marlins leftfielder Josh Willingham about it.

“It was funny,” he said. “He goes, ‘I don’t know. I think you missed it, but I don’t know.’ And he was the closest guy to it.”

At the general managers’ meetings in Orlando last November, the GMs voted 25-5 in favor of having Major League Baseball investigate a limited use of instant replay, for use only in determining home runs.

Somewhat surprisingly, considering the historic conservatism of the sport, not to mention commissioner Bud Selig’s stated opposition to the idea, the idea gained traction remarkably quickly. There is even a chance that it could be rolled out on a trial basis in some regular-season games this year and then utilized in the postseason.

Nobody wants games to be played by robots and officiated by electronic gizmos.

Everybody wants, or should want, to see as many calls as possible be made correctly.

In the end, that call didn’t impact the outcome of the game. Those turned out to be the only runs the Phillies scored and the Marlins piled on against the Phillies bullpen to win going away, 8-2.

It could have mattered, though.

One argument against instant replay is that it will add to the time of games as baseball is trying to eliminate as much dead time as possible. And that’s a fair point.

Except that Marlins third baseman Jorge Cantu signaled emphatically that he thought the ball was foul and Florida manager Fredi Gonzalez came out to argue and the umps huddled to compare notes. And ya gotta believe that in the time all that took, somebody could have looked at a replay and settled the issue once and for all.

Look, instant replay isn’t perfect. There are justifiable concerns about the home team making pictures available that don’t benefit them. Some replays are inconclusive. Even worse, there are plenty of times when one angle appears to support one conclusion and another appears to prove the opposite.

But when there’s a chance to get it right, why not? As Phillies general manager Pat Gillick said, explaining why he voted in favor of the idea last fall: “From a technical standpoint, why wouldn’t we want to get the play right? It seems like we were kind of behind the times and everybody knew what the call was except for the four guys [umpires] on the field.”

And that, in short, is why instant replay is coming soon to a ballpark near you. *

Send e-mail to hagenp@phillynews.com

Read more

Fox Sports reported on its Web site late last night that the Packers have traded the quarterback to the Jets. The report said the exact compensation wasn’t immediately known, but is believed to be a single draft pick that increases in value depending on New York’s performance during the season.

The Jets declined to comment on the report.

Favre’s agent, James “Bus” Cook, confirmed in an e-mail to the Associated Press earlier yesterday that the Jets and Tampa Bay Buccaneers were emerging as the most likely trade destinations for the three-time MVP.

Fox Sports reported that quarterback Chad Pennington likely would be let go, to allow for enough room under the salary cap to fit Favre’s salary.

Fox said the Jets were much more aggressive than the Bucs in their pursuit of Favre.

Late Tuesday, Fox said, Favre talked to Jets head coach Eric Mangini and others in the organization for the first time as they tried to convince Favre he would be a good fit in New York.

Read more

Jay Glazer of FoxSports.com reports that the Jets will provide a draft pick dependent on Favre’s performance in 2008.

Complete story to follow.

Read more